16 Apr Safety evaluation of Bacillus subtilis strains
The Bacillus subtilis group is generally considered as safe (so-called “GRAS” status), and comprises the closely related taxa Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus mojavensis, Bacillus vallismortis, Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii and Bacillus sonorensis (Wang et al., 2007). Their phenotypic differentiation is difficult, but DNA-DNA hybridization and comparative sequence analysis of 16S rRNA provide a firm basis for their identification
The safety of microorganisms that have been used traditionally in probiotics has been confirmed through a long period of cultural tradition and experience. Strains of species such as B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and B. sonorensis have been used extensively in (or are associated with) food processing throughout human history and ingestion of foods containing such live or dead bacteria and their metabolites has occurred over a long period of time (see: FAO Background Study Paper No. 65: http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/028/mg309e.pdf). So far, the safety of B. subtilis group has not been questioned in general, and reports of possible harmful effects of these microbes to the host are extremely rare. Rare cases are in fact related to “opportunistic” situations of immune compromised persons and patients at risk. On one hand, currently some authorities require proof of safety of newly isolated B. subtilis group strains before their commercialization and use in food biotechnology.Download PDF
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.